This week’s readings focused on the concept
of Actor Network Theory (ANT) which was developed by Michael Callon, Bruno
Latour and John Law. To be honest, this was a theory that was very difficult to
learn and having spent a few hours reading and rereading, I think I might just
have the gist of it.
Previous concepts that have tried to
conceptualise how networks are formed have usually employed narrow focus on
either technological or social factors. The problem with these theories is that
they don’t fully capture the nature of publishing (Deluki 2009). Social
determinism can lead to technological changes and technological determinism can
create social changes. Therefore ANT suggests that all actors/actants (whether
human, non-human, technology) have an equal role in the function of a network
and should be conceptualised in the same means (Wikipedia 2014). This is what
is known as a principle of generalised symmetry.
What really helped me grasp this concept is
the example that Goguen (2003) provided:
“Newton
did not really act alone in creating the theory of gravitation: he needed
observational data from the Astronomer Royal, John Flamsteed, he needed
publication support from the Royal Society and its members (most especially
Edmund Halley), he needed the geometry of Euclid, the astronomy of Kepler, the
mechanics of Galileo, the rooms, lab, food, etc.”
While we typically associate the theory of
gravitation with Newton, ANT suggests that other actors have as much to do with
the discovery as Newton himself. Each
actant is a nodal point where if it is excluded from the network, the network
will fail (Banks 2011). From this, we can determine how networks are formed and
what actors hold it together.
In relation to publishing, both social and
technological factors affect the nature of this network. Let’s use YouTube
videos as an example of a publishing network. In order for videos to be
recorded , commented and published you need the technological components like,
a camera, a comment page, hyperlinks, and a computer (with internet access) to
view the published video. However, for this network to function, you need
social actors that drive the video like the vlogger, advertisers and the
audience (that comment, share and like the video). ANT suggests that each actor
plays an equal role in making this network successful, but this is where I
disagree.
The flaw of this theory is that it does not
account for the different power relations between each actor in the process
(Banks 2011). While the audiences can help determine the value and the popularity
of the video through likes and views, the publisher/vlogger has ultimate
control over the content. Without the existence of the internet to view the
video then the network will fail. What is put in the front page of YouTube is technologically
determined through algorithms based on “watch time” (Jarboe 2011) and who you’re
subscribed to. However, without the people utilising these machines, the
network ceases to exist, therefore human actors play a much more powerful role
in determining the nature of the network. This puts into question whether technological
components should even be assigned agency into the network.
I am not saying that technical and social
actors cannot coexist in the publishing network but disregarding power, class,
culture imbalances can be problematic for the theory. I will therefore be very
cautious about applying ANT into conceptualising publics and publishing, not
until I get a much deeper understanding of the subject.
References
Banks, D.
(2011). A
Brief Summary of Actor Network Theory » Cyborgology. [online] Thesocietypages.org.
Available at:
http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/12/02/a-brief-summary-of-actor-network-theory/
[Accessed 18 Aug. 2014].
Goguen, J.
(2003). CSE
275: Chapter 6. [online] Cseweb.ucsd.edu. Available at:
http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~goguen/courses/275/s6.html [Accessed 18 Aug. 2014].
Jarboe, G.
(2012). YouTube
Algorithm Change: 'Time Watched' Key to Higher Video Search Rankings.
[online] Search Engine Watch. Available at:
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2218696/YouTube-Algorithm-Change-Time-Watched-Key-to-Higher-Video-Search-Rankings
[Accessed 18 Aug. 2014].
Wikipedia,
(n.d.). Actor–network
theory. [online] Available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor-network_theory [Accessed 18 Aug. 2014].
0 comments:
Post a Comment